EEE会議(北朝鮮核問題: 日中韓3国関係の複雑さ)..................................................................031021
北朝鮮核問題の解決のためには日米のほかに日韓中の緊密な連携プ
レーが不可欠ですが、この3者間の関係は残念ながら必ずしも緊密であ
るとは言えません。
最大の障害になっているのは、やはり歴史、靖国、教科書問題です。
中国は、将来の対日外交を有利に進めるためには歴史問題を未解決の
ままにしておいた方が得策と考えているようですし、日韓でも共通の歴史
教科書編纂の試みがなされているものの韓国側の対日不信感が相変わ
らず根強く、しっくり行きそうにありません。日本国内でも、対中、対韓関
係についていろいろ複雑な見方が存在しているのは事実です。このような
状態では、日本政府が拉致問題や核問題の解決に中韓の積極的な助力
を依頼しても(表面的にはともかく)なかなか本気に動いてくれるとは思え
ません。 日本外交にはまだまだ工夫の余地が残されているように思い
ます。
この点に関連して、小生が参加している米国の日本関係のEメール会議
で最近出てきた2通のメールをご紹介します。最初のものは中国との関
係、2番目のものは韓国との関係から論じています。何らご参考になれば
幸いです。
--KK
***************************************
I
too am not an expert on the textbooks, but I am very curious about
the issues
surrounding both countries' inability or unwillingness to
settle the history
debate to each other's satisfaction. I recollect
that young people in Japan
were polled reference this issue (CSIS
did the research I believe) and it was
found that Japan should do
more to heal the wounds so to speak, but they also
felt that China
should stop harping on the past and move on with the
relationship.
Young people favored making an apology and also favored
passing
on the sense of responsibility to the next generations. However,
as
pointed out by Mike Green and Ben Self in an article they published
in
Survival, in Japan's eyes China has lost the "moral superiority"
they used
for a long time regarding the history issue when China
became increasingly
aggressive reference Taiwan and territorial
disputes. As Japan sees China
become more of a threat the history
issue is not likely to be settled. In
addition, I don't think China
necessarily wants it settled - it's a great
tool to continue to pressure
Japan to make concessions when friction between
the two arises.
It's also a source of nationalism in China.
Paul
Daniels, Visiting Research Fellow, Institute for International
Policy
Studies
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The textbook issue
would indeed be a fruitful topic for some serious
research. Add South Korea
to the mix.
There is a committee of South Korean and Japanese historians
who
have been labouring away for some time to provide a common
version of
history. If they pull this one off, they would be good
candidates for the
Nobel Peace Prize!
Teaching a common version of history was critical to
West German-
Polish rapprochement in the early 1970s. And the shared history
of
Germany and Poland, with six million Poles killed in the second
world
war, is far 'worse' than anything that has happened between
South Korea and
Japan since the days of Hideyoshi and his mad
efforts to invade China via
Korea.
As noted, I also think it's time for the Japanese government to
get
out of the business of vetting textbooks in any shape or form.
Leave
it to professional historians, teachers and parents, as is
done in Western
countries. But presumably this is just another
instance of bureaucratic
interest trumping national interest in Japan.
Robyn
Lim